Home > Our Partners > URJ Biennial
Union for Reform Judaism Biennial Convention

Text of Dr. Mattson's Speech
For an Audio Version click here.
Click here for other media from this event.
Good morning and greetings of peace from the members of the Islamic Society of North America.
It is a great honor to have this opportunity to speak to the members of the Union for Reform Judaism at this wonderful convention.
Almost four months ago, Rabbi Yoffie stood in front of a general audience of attendees at the 44rth annual convention of the Islamic Society of North America, the organization of which I have been President since 2006. Our membership is diverse: it includes Muslims with origins from all parts of the world, men and women from different schools of thought and practice within Islamic tradition. We are an umbrella organization for Muslim individuals and organizations who wish to identify with and contribute to a larger vision of what it means to be a Muslim in North America, and who cooperate to develop strategies for achieving that vision. In the 44 years since we held our first convention, our umbrella has expanded and the voices included in dialogue have diversified: more women, more scholars representing different schools of Islamic thought, both modern and traditionalist, as well as leaders from other religious traditions.
Indeed, one significant feature of the American Muslim community is that it is dynamic, open to learning new ideas, and interested in expanding our understanding of what it takes to be an ethical and balanced Muslim in contemporary America. There are two major factors that have contributed to the positive transformation of the immigrant Muslim community especially:
First, the important role that religion plays in American history and culture. Muslims in the United States, unlike many Muslims in Europe, have found that religious affiliation and practice, in general, is valued in America. True, it was not and is not always easy finding ways to accommodate our specific religious practices in an overwhelmingly Christian society, but at least religion itself is not derided and marginalized. Muslims therefore are indebted to those who have championed the two twin pillars of religious vitality in American society: freedom of religion and the separation of church and state. We also are should be grateful to faithful believers, to Christians and Jews, who have demonstrated through their good works the positive power of faith in American society. The second major factor that has contributed to the dynamic transformation of the American Muslim community over the past few decades is the diversity of our community. As Muslims from different parts of the world came together in America to worship and fulfill the tenets of their faith, they did not always find themselves in agreement about the true Islamic position on many issues. Indeed, sometimes, the conversations became rather heated – and those disagreements have not yet ended in many places. Still, engaging in that conversation yielded two positive results. First, Muslims were forced to confront the reality that many cultural practices and beliefs contrary to our faith have been integrated into many traditional understandings of Islam. By confronting the differences, we became aware that sometimes the Islam that was been taught in Muslim societies was not in harmony with the ethical teachings of the Qur’an and the Prophet Muhammad, but were, in fact, misogynistic, authoritarian or extremist views antithetical to true Islam.
Secondly, the very act of discussing these differences, in a free society with no state-enforced religion, encouraged more respect for diversity within Islam, less support for authoritarian tendencies and a greater feeling of responsibility on the part of the ordinary Muslim to learn more about his or her religion.
I have to emphasize that not all Muslim Americans have embraced this perspective. We continue to receive new immigrants from other countries, some of whom are still deeply attached to their customs, and we have others who are simply ideologically opposed to dialogue and change.
It is because that many members of the Islamic Society of North America have gone through this process of transformation that our community is now ready to engage in a meaningful way with Jewish communities in this dialogue project. I suppose I should not have been surprised then, when the Muslims assembled in the hall at our annual convention on August 31 gave Rabbi Yoffie not just a polite response, but a standing ovation. In the weeks following the convention, I was approached by many people who were excited by our engagement with the Union for Reform Judaism. Many of our members have already established some connection between their local congregation and a nearby Jewish community – some of these relationships began a number of years ago. Others have been interested in reaching out, but did not know where to start. Most of our communities are severely limited in resources to develop such programs.
Indeed, as we move forward with our dialogue project, I ask our Jewish partners to keep this in mind. Muslims are not new to America – indeed, a significant number of the Africans brought to the Americas as slaves were Muslim, but of course, they were neither allowed to practice their religion, nor to transmit it to their children. It is only in the last few decades, therefore, that our community has been able to begin to establish institutions that support our religious life and allow us to teach our children our practices and values. We are still in the early stages of our development. Many communities are still building mosques, while others have moved to other basic facilities like community centers and schools. Our human resources are even less developed. We are blessed to have many wonderful people who volunteer to serve our communities, but, of course, they are limited in their time as well as the expertise needed to minister to and support American Muslim communities. We do not yet have a full-time Islamic seminary in America.
Although this lack of development might seem to be a drawback, because it limits the capacity of many of our communities to fully engage with neighboring Jewish congregations, in fact, the very existence of this gap in development provides a wonderful opportunity for constructive engagement. Jewish communities can offer practical advice and suggestions at this formative stage of the institutionalization of Islam in America. In many cases, Muslims have instinctively turned to the example of Jews in America to understand how to deal with the challenges we face as religious minorities – whether these challenges involve securing the right to religious accommodation in public institutions, or dealing with workplace discrimination.
At the same time, I believe that the Jewish community will also benefit from having Muslim partners in the struggle to uphold the Constitutional separation of church and state, to promote civil liberties, to extend religious accommodation to minorities, and to counter prejudice and hatred.
In his speech at our convention, Rabbi Yoffie discussed the increasing hatred and intolerance that is being expressed in public forums, in the media, and even by politicians towards Muslims. When Keith Ellison, the first Muslim elected to congress chose to have his ceremonial swearing of office using a Qur’an, he was attacked as un-American and a terrorist sympathizer. Now, during the presidential primaries, we see candidates being asked to prove that they comply with an ever narrower definition of what is means to be a Christian – forget about being a Muslim or a Jew. Alarmingly, many Americans implicitly or even explicitly are using a religious test for who should be President of the United States. This and other issues involving the separation of church and state and religious freedom are important areas of cooperation between American Jews and Muslims.
The American Muslim community is well aware, after 9/11, that much false information about our community as well as our religion, has been disseminated by religious and political ideologues. It is also true that many Americans simply know little or nothing about Islam and, perhaps, naturally extrapolate from the nasty figures they see in the news to Muslims in general. Of course, it is our responsibility to reclaim Islam from the terrorists and extremists. That is why American Muslims have been public in our views on terrorism and extremism in the name of our religion. We have published fatwas – religious verdicts – proving that suicide bombing, vigilante operations, terrorism, and hate-mongering is prohibited in true Islam. We have issued press releases, we have published articles and books, we have delivered sermons, we have given lectures to Muslims of all ages, we have held workshops and seminars, we have met with government officials in the US and abroad – all with the goal of spreading the message that mainstream Muslims oppose the extremists and we are putting our efforts, individually and institutionally, to marginalize those who misuse our religion for nefarious purposes.
The sad reality is that, no matter what we do, there are some who will choose to continue to characterize us and our religion as essentially evil. There is a long tradition of anti-Muslim discourse in European history and culture – from Dante to Don Quixote to Orientalism. I will never forget my visit to the Cathedral of Zaragoza a few years ago, where I was confronted with an image of a Muslim literally being crushed under the feet of Santiago. And on the other side of the Cathedral was a statue of Saint Dominguito – the patron saint of choir boys, who, according to our tour guide, “the Jews of Zaragossa conspired to murder;” all the alleged conspirators – all falsely accused – were executed. This story and these images are still being told and seen in this European church today. We all know, of course, what happened to the Muslims and Jews of medieval Spain.
In modern times, other forms of communication: newspapers, cartoons and films have continued to produce hateful images of Muslims, as they did with Jews before – sometimes the caricatures are almost identical. Medieval and modern European images of Jews as deceptive, conspiring to overthrow Christian rule, odd in their manner and dress, dehumanized Jews, thereby softening the ground to allow the atrocities of the Holocaust. Six million Jews in the heart of Europe , in the 20th century, brutalized and killed in the most despicable manner – how could that happen except by a successful campaign of propaganda, as well as a ruthless but efficiently rational system of identifying, classifying, collecting, moving and then exterminating Jewish men, women and children. This is one of the greatest tragedies of modern history and ISNA will witness to this truth, anytime and to anyone in the Muslim world who denies it.
Today, I do not fear that such a crime could happen to the American Muslim community. Yet I am anxious about the level of dehumanization of my community. I am worried that it is politically correct to mock and insult Muslims in the media and in public. It concerns me that, when I spoke in a church recently, one man likened the Muslims of the world to ants in a colony – saying that, like them, we may be working separately, but it is known that we are working together for a common purpose. To analogize my community to a group of insects is deeply disturbing. The implication that we are conspiring towards a common nefarious goal is upsetting to say the least. But these ideas are necessary to allow atrocities. It is, I believe, why most Americans have not protested waterboarding, sensory deprivation and other forms of torture of Muslim detainees and even Muslim American citizens.
I believe that hatred and intolerance is easily transferable. I am not surprised that some young men who responded “Happy Hannukah” to “Merry Christmas” were attacked on the New York subway. I am happy that it was a Muslim who jumped in to defend the Jewish men. This small incident highlights our common threat at the same time as it highlights our common interests and shared humanity.
This is why I am delighted that ISNA and the URJ are embarking on this dialogue project, so our communities can learn about each other, to rid ourselves of the ignorance we have of the other, and move on, God willing, to work together for the greater good.
I am not naïve about the challenges we face as we undertake this project. Certainly my Muslim community will need to draw upon the skills we have developed to distinguish true Islam from cultural biases and medieval accretions to our religion when it comes to the Jewish community. Muslim anti-Semitism was never like European Christian anti-Semitism, but it existed in any case. And unfortunately, there are ambitious political rulers in the Muslim world who manipulate religious sentiment against the Jewish people to extend their authoritarian rule. At the same time, Jewish Americans need hear the concern that Muslim Americans express about the suffering of the Palestinian people as genuine and justified, and not assume that such concern originates from a hatred of the Jewish people. I have seen the tears of elderly Palestinian men as they spoke about being forced to leave the homes of their fathers and their fathers’ fathers during the founding of the state of Israel. I have been moved by those tears as I was moved by the site of numbers tattooed on the forearms of elderly men who survived the Holocaust. If religion is about anything, it should be about the ability to extend empathy beyond our own family or tribe or religious community to humanity at large.
Certainly our children know this. Our Jewish and Muslim children meet each other in school and in sports and they care about other. The question is, will the religious teachings that we impart to our children serve to expand their empathy and encourage solidarity with each other, at the same time as these teachings serve the very important purpose of giving them a deep sense of attachment to their specific communities and traditions. Polls show that in the last decade, fewer numbers of Americans identify with any religious tradition, and more Americans view religion as a negative force in society. If our religious traditions are going to survive, they have to demonstrate not only that they are good in themselves, but that they are good all together. That religious difference does not lead to conflict and disorder in society, but that religious differences only serve to enrich our collective understanding of the Creator who is beyond the comprehension of any created being. The Qur’an states, “To each among you have we prescribed a law and an open way. If God had so willed, He would have made you a single people, but (His plan is) to test you in what He has given you: so strive as in a race in all virtues. The goal of you all is to God. It is He who will show you the truth of the matters in which you now dispute (5:48).” Let us strive for good, to improve each of us, and to improve all of us. May God help us in this effort.
Sermon by Rabbi Eric Yoffie President, Union for Reform Judaism
The entire sermon by Rabbi Yoffie can be found here.
Section II.
We have many other items on our agenda, of course. I attach special importance to a
proposal that our Union has developed for dialogue with our Muslim neighbors.For several reasons, this program of dialogue is especially critical now.
First, there exists in our community a profound ignorance about Islam, along with a real desire to learn about what moves and motivates Muslims today. We must respond to this desire with serious programs of education.
Second, we live in a world in which religion is manipulated to justify the most horrific acts, a world in which—make no mistake—Islamic extremists constitute a profound threat. For some, this is a reason to flee from dialogue, but in fact the opposite is true. When we are killing each other in the name of God, sensible religious people have an obligation to do something about it. Our task is to find the voices of moderation and to reclaim from the fanatics the true essence of religious belief.
Third, as a once-persecuted minority in countries where anti-Semitism is still a force, we understand the plight of Muslims in North America today. Yes, thank God, most American and Canadian Muslims are treated with dignity. But since 9/11, we do not lack for purveyors of hate who see Muslims as a fifth column and who engage in the ugliest form of stereotyping, casually ascribing to all the guilt of a tiny minority.
I am proposing that we work together with ISNA, the Islamic Society of North America. ISNA is an umbrella body of more than 300 mosques that brings together 30,000 people at its annual convention. I was the first major Jewish leader to address this convention, and in my remarks this August, I discussed the dialogue project that we hope to launch after the Biennial.
We chose ISNA as our partner because it is the closest equivalent to the Union within the American Muslim community. It has issued a strong and unequivocal condemnation of terror, including a specific condemnation of Hizbollah and Hamas terror against Jews and Israelis. It has also recognized Israel as a Jewish state and supported a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. These statements provide the framework of common values that we believe are necessary for a fruitful dialogue to occur.
We have no intention of avoiding the subject of Israel in our discussions. Some have suggested that we do so, but a Jewish-Muslim dialogue that does not deal with Israel and Palestine would be pointless.
Dr. Ingrid Mattson, the president of ISNA, will address us tomorrow. She is a powerful spokesperson for a community that is overwhelmingly moderate in their views, and what we want to do is join them, encourage them and learn from them.
The building blocks of this program are in place. Together with ISNA, and working with both Jewish and Muslim scholars, we have produced a manual and video that we hope will be used by Union synagogues and ISNA mosques in a five-session dialogue. We have already identified ten locations in which one synagogue and one mosque have agreed to pair up and pilot this program. Other interested synagogues should contact our Commission on Interreligious Affairs and we will work with you to find a partner. We have also prepared a detailed adult education curriculum on Islam, and we are urging every synagogue to consider offering a course on Islam as part of its adult education program.
Following my speech at the ISNA convention, our proposal for dialogue was warmly welcomed in our Movement. In the broader Jewish community, however, we heard many loud voices of reaction, including the suggestion that we reconsider because of the need to maintain “the unity of the community.”
Let it be plainly said: This is nonsense, and dangerous nonsense at that. We have had quite enough of the shrill voices who profess to speak in our name and who use the slogan of “unity” to impose their views on the moderate majority. North American Jews remain now what they have always been—centrist, reasonable and ready to reach out to their neighbors.
Some Jews, we know, have made common cause with fundamentalist preachers who describe Muslim Americans in near-Satanic terms. But if these Jews are not protesting such attacks with all the power at their disposal, they should be ashamed of themselves. The last thing that we want is to build alliances that rely on or accept the trashing of another religion. And while we will fight Islamic extremism with every ounce of our being, we have been the victims of indiscriminate hatred for far too long to inflict it now on others. Jews have never taught hatred as an answer to hatred, and we will not begin now.
My friends, we enter into this dialogue with our eyes wide open. We know that there are not a lot of Muslim Zionists, and that ISNA—a large, unwieldy coalition—contains some elements that cause us discomfort. We also know that while we have had extraordinary success with dialogue in Great Neck, St. Louis and Omaha, so too have we had our share of failures.
But none of this deters us. We will not be like those in the Jewish community who assert a willingness to talk to Muslims and then find a thousand reasons not to do so. Our plan will be simple: We will not feed each other pabulum, and we will assert our convictions with passion, even as we remain respectful of our disagreements.
And we do this because of our deep conviction that America is different, one of the very few places where the promise of true pluralism is not too wild a hope; and because we know as religious Americans that in this great country, we are stronger and safer when we transcend our fears and work together, rather than apart.
To learn more about the Children of Abraham Dialogue Project please visit us here.